Pseudoarchaeology Research Archive (PARA) Cite as: Johnson, Emma. 2007. The 'Mysterious' Nazca Lines. PARA Web Bibliography B-01. http://pseudoarchaeology.org/b01-johnson.html Contact information |
The
“Mysterious” Nazca Lines
A Bibliographical
Tour of the Internet
Emma Johnson
May 5, 2007
This work is licensed
under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0
License. To view a copy of this license, visit
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ or send a letter to Creative
Commons, 171 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105,
USA.
The purpose of this bibliography is to expose the reader to the many inaccurate, confusing, and sometimes ridiculous theories that are held about the famous Nazca lines in Peru. While a great deal of legitimate scholarship has been written that studies their construction, purpose, variability, and place in the chronology of Andean prehistory, most of this research has been systematically ignored by popular pseudoarchaeologists in favour of more sensational theories that emphasize their mystery, antiquity, and originality. These theories are increasingly found and widely circulated online. While they must be recognized and ultimately discarded, it is important to note that the difference between pseudo- and mainstream archaeology may not be, in the case of the Nazca lines, a simple dichotomy. Many websites continue to cite the work of Andean scholars while simultaneously misrepresenting their theories and combining them with pseudoscientific ones; therefore, the following bibliography must be treated with the same skepticism that it promotes, as it often refers to pseudoarchaeological ideas that are in fact based on legitimate scholarship. I have organized and categorized these theories to the best of my ability, starting with the ones that most heavily rely on Andean academia as their inspiration. While I am not including all of the sites I have found – many are repetitive, and some blatantly plagiarize each other – included here are the most comprehensive and most recent sites that attempt to explain the “mystery” of the Nazca lines.
All websites and sources
retrieved on March 11, 2007.
The “Mysterious” Nazca Lines: Which Theories are
Pseudo-Theories?
Nazca Lines Theories.
from
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/nazca/esp_lineas_nazca_2.htm
This site provides an excellent introduction to Nazca line
theory. Though it is predominantly
pseudoarchaeological, some Andean scholars such as Anthony Aveni, Helaine
Silverman and William H. Isbell are also cited. Many of these theories will be discussed
below, although some, such as Thomas Wick’s belief that the lines represent the
plan of a cathedral, can no longer be found online; this suggests that the site
is somewhat outdated, and only emphasizes how quickly Internet-based theories
can change or disappear.
Nazca Lines and Culture. from
http://www.crystalinks.com/nasca.html
The Nazca Lines. from
http://www.dreamscape.com/morgana/rosalind.htm
These two sites provide excellent examples of typical
pseudoarchaeological descriptions of the Nazca lines. They have all the common markers: little
or no information about the author; a rhetoric of mystery that makes the
construction of the lines (and their builders) unknown and possibly unknowable;
captions on all the photos that shock the reader with almost no explanation or
relevant text; images strategically paired with carvings from other cultures to
insinuate hyper-diffusion; a few out-of-place sentences that make bold
statements without any supporting information; a list, in part plagiarized from
the above site or vice versa, that explains all the theories without clearly
choosing one; and finally, a convoluted and poorly researched history of the
Nazca people and Cahuachi, the region’s main archaeological site. Admittedly, the site from Crystalinks
does acknowledge that humans built the lines (see below for those that do not),
and also mentions Nazca mummy bundles and polychrome pottery – perhaps a sign
that someone has done their research.
However, both represent typical pseudoarchaeological sites that can
easily be mistaken for trustworthy ones because they provide a few tantalizingly
accurate details.
A Map of the Stars: Archaeoastronomical
Theories
Doore, Kathy. Maria Reiche: The Nazca Lines
Theory. from
http://www.labyrinthina.com/mariareiche.htm
By far the most popular theories that emerge about the Nazca
lines, both in legitimate and pseudo-archaeological websites, are those that
involve archaeoastronomy. Maria
Reiche was a research assistant of Paul Kosok, the first to study the Nazca
lines, and she has since been dubbed the mother of Nazca research by pseudo- and
mainstream archaeologists alike.
Her almost mythic status in the field can be seen in numerous websites
dedicated to her memory; this site is simply one example of such a trend. It tells the rather romantic story of
her dedication to the Nazca lines that resulted in her moving to the area to
protect and study the sites. Her
theories, based on a background in mathematics, revolved around the concept that
the lines represented an astronomical calendar and observatory. These ideas, and at the very least
Reiche’s life story, weigh heavily on the minds of pseudoarchaeologists who see
her as a pioneer in the field (Belokon, below, calls her “the Guardian Angel of
the Nazca plateau”).
Edgar, Robin.
2000. The Nazca Lines and
the “Eye in the Sky”: How Total Solar Eclipses Inspired the Nazca Lines and
Geoglyphs. from
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/nazca/esp_lineas_nazca_16.htm
Representing an astronomical explanation that is based more
in pseudoarchaeology, Robin Edgar believes the lines and anthropomorphic/animal
images were designed for the eyes of all-seeing gods that live in the sky. The Nazca concept of this eye is largely
based on viewing solar eclipses, which Edgar seems to believe look like human
eyes, and claims that this theme is present in many ancient civilizations
worldwide. Interestingly enough,
this site is a reproduction of Edgar’s work by another individual; the author
seems to have taken the original website offline. This makes it even more difficult to
determine if anyone, even the author, supports or continues this
work.
Belokon, Alla. 2000.
The Mystery of the Nazca Lines and Geoglyphs: The View from
Russia. from
A more extreme example of an astronomical perspective on the
Nazca lines is this poorly translated site explaining the theories of Russian
pseudoscientist Alla Belokon. Best summarized in his own words, he “suggests
that the Nazca lines represent our Solar system planets as crystal structure
nodes, and were built by a flow of directed energy of unknown nature from the
air.” His claims that they display
exact and advanced mathematical knowledge are not unlike other theories about
the lines (see Munck, below). Most
surprising to any archaeologist is his claim that the lines are impossible to
make by hand, and that it would have taken more than 100,000 man-years to
construct. Instead, Belokon says,
they were built from a flow of energy, and therefore imitate optical
diagrams. The mathematics of the
lines indicate locations of planets in the solar system (numbered by how far
away they are from the sun – the Earth is 3, for example). Although convoluted and difficult to
understand, he seems to believe that there is some connection being made between
our solar system and another unknown system, with Earth as the
intermediary. While concluding this
page with a disclaimer that he doesn’t want to “decrease the significance” of
the ancient Peruvian cultures, this page only represents the beginning of
Belokon’s bizarre theories about the Nazca: he continues elsewhere in his site
to explain the significance of the anthropomorphic and animal drawings. He mysteriously concludes on another
linked page (http://alla-belokon.narod.ru/scheme_fin.html)
with a rhetorical question: “What is this layout supposed to tell us? Or is it a
sort of warning?”
Irrigation (and Dowsing): Agricultural Theories
Johnson, David.
The Water Lines of Nazca.
from
http://www.rumbosonline.com/articles/11-50-nazca.htm
While admittedly the redirecting of water and the
exploitation of underground resources were essential parts of Andean life,
Johnson suggests that the Nazca lines were built to exploit aquifers that he has
supposedly found using dowsing, a highly controversial method of locating
underground water supplies using metal rods. He claims that dowsing was probably used
by the Nazca to locate water in the same way. This theory sits in opposition to, and
takes away from, some legitimate agricultural theories that associate the lines
with surface drainage systems and the religious and spiritual connotations of
running water in Andean culture.
Proulx, Donald. The Nazca Lines Project
(1996-2000). from
http://www-unix.oit.umass.edu/~proulx/Nasca_Lines_Project.html
A project by Donald Proulx at University of Massachusetts in
collaboration with David Johnson (see above) concluding that the Nazca lines
were designed as an irrigation system to provide pathways for ground water. While they seem to use a scientific
method and test this claim in the Nazca valley, later in the page he mentions
Johnson’s use of dowsing and “his perceived ability to locate and trace the flow
of water underground”. Proulx
sounds skeptical that this theory is true for all the Nazca lines, but appears
to be convinced for a few of them.
The bibliography includes several actual Andean scholars, including
Anthony Aveni, Paul Kosok, Maria Reiche, and Helaine Silverman, but also
includes Erich von Daniken; this makes the site particularly difficult to
evaluate and blurs the line between its pseudo- and mainstream archaeological
components.
Experimental Archaeology: Prehistoric Balloon
Theories
Nott, Julian. The Extraordinary Nazca Prehistoric
Balloon. from
http://www.nott.com/Pages/projects.php
Julian Nott describes on his website an experiment that he
conducted with his colleague Jim Woodman.
They successfully flew a hot-air balloon built with technology available
to the Nazca, claiming that it would have been necessary to see the lines from
the air in order to ensure their accuracy and plan the drawings themselves. While the use of experimental
archaeology provides an interesting insight into our perceptions of ancient
technology and the abilities of prehistoric peoples, Woodman and Nott make the
assumption that the Nazca people were incapable of imaginative and abstract
thought that would have allowed them to perceive the final image of the lines
without viewing them for themselves.
The Oldest GPS in the World: Archaeocryptographical
Theories
Munck, Carl. Nazca Lines and Archaeocryptography. from
http://www.pyramidmatrix.com/nazca_lines.htm
Carl Munck, a so-called archaeocryptographer, views many
ancient monuments as “codes” that reflect their latitude and longitude on the
globe; in essence, he sees the Nazca lines as a primitive map. Using a complex and pretty illogical
series of numbers associated with random attributes of the line he calls Manos,
he says that the image is attempting to describe its position on the globe. In order for his theory to work, he
changes the Greenwich Prime Meridian to the Giza pyramids, claiming that “the
ancients” would not have known about Greenwich but would have surely known about
Giza. According to this theory, the
Nazca understood complex arithmetic, the Old World 360-degree system, and more
importantly global positioning and the location of the equator.
Just Wait ‘Til 2012: Catastrophic Theories
Bast, Robert.
2006. The Nazca
Lines. from
http://www.survive2012.com/nazca_lines_1.php
This is the first of five pages in which Bast suggests that
the lines indicate a “cyclical global catastrophe”. Since they last a long time, use a
universal language, and include coded information, they will be helpful for
surviving 2012, his projected end of the world based on the completely unrelated
Mayan calendar. From a
“catastrophic viewpoint”, he notes that there is one picture of every major
animal group, representing death and “the end of the line”; he contrasts this
with Noah’s ark, a story in which two of
each animal symbolizes “fertility and survival”. Bast connects the two ideas by positing
that the Nazca lines represent a great flood, pointing out the irony that they
are in such a dry landscape (which he mistakenly claims could not hold an
advanced or populous civilization).
He also suggests that the straight Nazca lines, with star-like radiating
centres, could be a map of Orion’s belt, citing the Egyptian pyramids as
precedent for this theory. He
interprets all of this as a global set of coded messages suggesting that another
flood is approaching (presumably sometime in 2012).
Thank You, von Daniken: Alien Astronaut Theories
Decker, Nathan. 2005. Timeline of our Mysterious World: A
chronological listing of Aliens, UFOs, Conspiracies, Cover-Ups, Monsters and
other weirdness! from
http://www.geocities.com/nmdecke/MysteriousWorld.html
This site is a rather eclectic and sometimes humorous
chronology of all the major paranormal, pseudoscientific and
pseudoarchaeological theories that have been popular in the last few
decades. Most interesting for our
purposes is the entry at 13,000,000BC, that the Ica Stones display great
technological and medical advancements and also describe the Nazca lines. At 800BC, “aerial landing strips” are
built in Peru, presumably referring again to the Nazca lines; the theory that
the lines are either ancient landing strips or human attempts to call back
aliens (similar to modern cargo cults) was popularized by Erich von Daniken, and
has since become a staple in the pseudoarchaeological world. Regardless of the confusion of exactly
when the lines were constructed, both dates given are far too early to be
accurate. This only reiterates the
common pseudoarchaeological practice of faulty chronology and vague dates that
are meant to illustrate the artifact’s antiquity and ancient, “mysterious”
status.
UFO Area. The Mystery of Nazca Drawings. from
http://www.global-conspiracies.com/mystery_of_nazca_drawings.htm
This site is an excellent archetype of an “alien astronaut”
site that includes information on the Nazca lines. In typical pseudoarchaeological style,
this site never explicitly states that the lines are landing strips, calendars,
or signs of any kind; instead, the author (named only UFO Area) implies these
facts through strategically placed captions, questions, and images. The site also follows the common
practice of using mysterious language, emphasizing that “no one knows” who built
the Nazca lines or why. Finally,
once again, the site uses sources from real Andean scholars like Paul Kosok to
prove its point, causing confusion for any reader who is not familiar with
prehistoric Latin American archaeology.
Doore, Kathy. The Nazca Spacesport and the Ica Stones of
Peru. from
http://www.labyrinthina.com/ica.htm
Though predominantly focusing on interpretations of the Ica
Stones, theories supported on this page refer to the Nazca lines as the “Nazca
port” from which a technologically advanced ancient civilization left the Earth
to settle on a new planet.
According to this narrative, the lines are an “energy matrix and
electronic field”, displaying the electromagnetic energy that was harnessed by
this civilization, known as Gliptolithic man. The lines are “magnetically stamped”
onto the surface and what we see today are the mere remnants of the originals
used to propel and navigate ships into the atmosphere before leaving the solar
system. The site characteristically
alludes to a government cover-up, claiming that the Peruvian government refuses
to acknowledge or study the evidence.
The site also suggests that, since the Ica stones supposedly depict
images of dinosaurs, the Nazca lines are much older than previously
suspected.
A Retracted Theory: Alan Alford and the Negroid
Slaves
Alford, Alan F.
1996. Chapter 14: The
Toil of Gods and Men. from Gods of the
New Millennium. from
Alan Alford’s original theory, here reproduced in a chapter
from his book, combines several pseudoarchaeological theories. He believes that the Nazca lines are an
act of vandalism made by “Negroid” slaves working at Tiwanaku, a site located at
the base of Lake Titicaca. He
claims that when the slaves rebelled and stole the aircraft of Ishkur,
originally a Babylonian-Assyrian god, they flew above the Nazca valley and
created images that mocked the god, simultaneously destroying some of his
earlier works (which were made using advanced technology that directed a
“cutting beam” to the surface).
This theory combines elements of hyper-diffusionism, including the
assumption that Negroid slaves somehow made it to South America in a
pre-colonial era, and the alien astronaut theory, describing Mesopotamian gods
as living individuals with the technology to fly. He also uses imagery from other cultures
and time periods, such as Tiwanaku, Olmec, and even Easter Island, to prove that
these slaves traveled and settled in distant regions all over the world. If we go to Alford’s official site (http://www.eridu.co.uk/), he clearly cites
von Daniken as one of his inspirations, and this is not surprising considering
the content of his theories.
marduk. Thu Jan 25, 2007. Post from
http://archaeologica.boardbot.com/viewtopic.php?p=26519&sid=aed6491ea7fb787289adbdce94a2c79e
After reading about Alford’s theory indirectly on other
sites, I initially had difficulty finding the original document online. I searched through every site I could
find that talked about Negroid slaves building the Nazca lines, but Alford’s
official site does not mention such a theory at all. This post, if accurate, may explain why
this is the case. It quotes not
only the theory itself, but also Alford’s 2005 retraction of the theory and many of his other ideas from
Gods of the New Millennium.
He has, in fact, written a new foreword for the latest edition of the
book that withdraws many of his earlier statements (more information on this can
again be found on his website; this post directs you to the exact
location). This is merely one
example of how misleading information on the Internet can be: theories no longer
held – even by their creators – are treated by others as contemporary and
supported beliefs without any chronological context.
Alford, Alan F.
1998. The Mystery of the
Nazca Lines. from
http://www.eridu.co.uk/Author/Mysteries_of_the_World/Nazca/nazca.html
This appears to be Alford’s latest thoughts on the Nazca
lines; the words ‘slave’, ‘Negroid’, and ‘Ishkur’ do not appear at all. In fact, this appears to be a relatively
well-researched review of the work of Andean scholars such as Maria Reiche,
Anthony Aveni and Johan Reinhard.
He seems to particularly support the work of Reinhard, who believes that
the lines should be viewed as religious artifacts connected to concepts of
water, fertility, and the worship of mountains as divine ancestors (all
recognized aspects of Andean religion).
However, he ends on a characteristically pseudoarchaeological note and,
unable to understand the worship of inanimate objects, he claims that “our best
guess must surely be that the Nazcans derived their gods from their experiences
of fireballs in the sky and meteorites falling to the Earth.”
A Final Test
Alien Runways and Hallucinogenic Cacti. from
http://www.funtrivia.com/playquiz/quiz2410961b9aac8.html
While not a reliable source for legitimate archaeological
information, this fun and informative quiz will test your knowledge of the main
pseudoarchaeological theories held about the Nazca lines, many of which were
covered in the above bibliography.
Once you have submitted your answers, the authors of the quiz give you
your results with additional information, and will tell you how many people have
answered correctly. Surprisingly,
the average score for this test is 8/10.
I can only hope that this is not a sign that people are overwhelmingly
familiar with pseudo- rather than mainstream archaeological information about
the Nazca lines; instead, I hope this kind of awareness is an indication that
these theories are not taken too seriously by the general
population.